I am extremely proud to be an American! However, for the first time in my life I am seriously concerned about the deep and destructive influences of Marxism in American Politics. Studying the influences and the friends of our political leaders helps me to understand what is behind all of this incompetence…perhaps this information will help you as well…
Would you like to better understand why Barack Obama acts as he does as President? Read the articles below in total to understand his influences and that of some of his teachers…
The Influence of Marxism In American Politics
Are you receiving the leadership that you expect from your American President?
The President’s leadership style which many times is no leadership at all, avoidance of calling things what they really are, not being honest with the American People, acting as if he is Congress, ignoring the Constitution, and picking and choosing the laws he will enforce is really grating on the nerves of many of those who love this country and who have different expectations of a president. And by the way, this is not what a President is charged with doing. Why is this happening?
And then another key issue for most Americans is “Political Correctness”…we have sad cases in America where this Administration will not call an “act of terrorism” an “act of terrorism” however calls it “workplace violence” denying the world the real truth. Read about why this should be thrown in the garbage according to the founder of ACT! for America.
The Washington Post just published an article including several polls on…
Michelle Obama took some heat in 2008 for saying that, “for the first time in my adult life I am proud of my country…“
Either way…we seem to be in for another two years of Saul Alinsky’s Socialist Marxism from this President…and I pray that we don’t elect another of Alinsky’s students. You may want to research information on why Hillary Clinton wrote a thesis on Saul Alinsky.
Alinsky believed that the struggle itself is empowering and important, in and of itself. “People power” is another way to say the rule of the people, and not elites or institutions or representatives. This is Marxism. Our president is cited as being the greatest acolyte of Saul Alinsky. The articles below are “must reads” for voting Americans!
Given the evidence that is mounting on the actions and lack of action by this Administration, it seems logical that Congress would conclude that the President should be impeached or that Congress should enact their powers of limiting expenditures in strategic places. This is what the Constitution provides however the Congress is allowing themselves to be overwhelmed with the masterful strategies of the President’s implementation of “Hope and Change” and constant “Rub Them Raw” irritations according to the Saul Alinsky tactics that he has learned and taught so well.
Saul Alinsky’s Tremendous Impact on American Politics!
Were you aware of the incredibly strong impact that Saul Alinsky is having on how Mr. Obama fulfills his duties? This explains the strategies Mr. Obama uses to “rub Americans raw”. According to Saul Alinsky…this is just part of the plan to keep people irritated…
It makes me raise the question…isn’t this extremely contrary to the Oath Of Office of the President of the United States?
NEW ENGLISH REVIEW
by D. L. Adams (January 2010)
Saul Alinsky and his “community organizing” methods and philosophy have had a profound influence on the politics of the United States. Recent history would suggest that this influence is just short of catastrophic.
worked for Alinsky organizations and taught seminars
in Alinsky tactics and methodology during his “community organizing” period in Chicago. Michelle Obama echoed Alinsky’s words
in her speech at the Democratic Convention.
“Barack stood up that day,” talking about a visit to Chicago neighborhoods, “and spoke words that have stayed with me ever since. He talked about “The world as it is” and “The world as it should be…”
And, “All of us driven by a simple belief that the world as it is just won’t do – that we have an obligation to fight for the world as it should be.”
Saul Alinsky, “Rules for Radicals,” Chapter 2:
“The means-and-ends moralists, constantly obsessed with the ethics of the means used by the Have-Nots against the Haves, should search themselves as to their real political position. In fact, they are passive-but real-allies of the Haves … The most unethical of all means is the non-use of any means … The standards of judgment must be rooted in the whys and wherefores of life as it is lived, the world as it is, not our wished-for fantasy of the world as it should be.“
Alinsky is making a strong case in this quote for the abandonment of morals and ethics as nothing but impediments to political success. For Alinsky, as for Michelle and Barack Hussein Obama, morality and ethics prevent the world from being what “it should be.” The Alinsky end game is likely a global utopia in which the “people” have “power.” Unfortunately, this utopianism has been the foundation of several über-violent movements of the last century which have resulted in over 100 million deaths.
Alinsky’s dedication of “Rules for Radicals” to Lucifer is easily understood; as a champion of amorality and the abandonment of ethics as nothing more than props that sustain the status quo Lucifer is the perfect model of the destroyer for the activist Alinsky.
The fact that our top political leadership has embraced this amoral set of tactics for political gain should cause all Americans concern.
There is no utopia; those who have strived to make the impossible real, to implement their grand visions of life have been the agents of death and destruction on a scale surpassed only perhaps by Islam. Alinsky, like the Koran, Sira, and Hadith, represents morality turned upside down or abandoned entirely in favor of cold pragmatism.
ACORN’s transgressions and fraud were so abysmal that the federal government
de-funded the organization several months ago. ACORN operates on Alinsky principles of immorality
and total radical pragmatism, after all, they are trying to usher in the people’s utopia; why should they allow mere ethics, legalities, and other such encumbrances to interfere with their mission to save humanity from itself?
Recently, ACORN employees attempted to assist two young people who wanted to start an illegal sex business; unfortunately for the ACORN people the two entrepreneurs were actually conservative activists who had filmed the entire encounter
. Following in the path of Alinsky, what could be wrong with a bit of prostitution
and other sex-related “businesses” if it “empowered the people
” and could help to de-construct the institutions of society? For ACORN it was a win-win opportunity.
Alinsky’s mission was to incite constant struggle and agitation so that the oppressive “system” would eventually be brought to its knees; ACORN is on the same path, but pretends legitimacy much better than Alinsky ever attempted
. In fact, the ACORN “sting” as it is now known is Alinsky methodology put to good use.
ACORN and its Alinsky amorality were supported by our current President.
“In fact, Obama’s Acorn connection
is far more extensive. In the few stories where Obama’s role as an Acorn “leadership trainer” is noted, or his seats on the boards of foundations that may have supported Acorn are discussed, there is little follow-up. Even these more extensive reports miss many aspects of Obama’s ties to Acorn.” (Stanley Kurtz, National Review
Many Americans have read Alinsky’s books and understand his methods; this is excellent as so few read Mein Kampf, and fewer still have read the Koran
, Sira, and Hadith. These are the foundational texts of existential opposition to the existence of the United States in its present form.
The fact that our current President and Secretary of State (wannabe President Hillary Clinton), are followers of Alinsky is beyond disturbing.
That so many Americans know Alinsky is heartening but few know the motivations behind the agitation that is so central to the Alinsky method and further what it means when a professional agitator acquires the power that they claim to require. What kind of effective governance is possible from the permanent agitator when the reins of power are handed to him/her? We have seen the results.
The problem with the Alinsky method is that the end game is amorphous; the end game is the acquisition of power but little is said of what to do with that power once acquired. The core of Alinsky’s method is destruction, destruction of the “system” that allows a disparity of wealth. There is no discussion of what is to replace this system once it is brought down. However, there is little doubt that Alinsky’s idea of a better “system” is one that brings forced equivalence or Marxism. Fundamentally, the struggle to get power is the essence of Alinsky, what to do with the power once acquired is another matter altogether.
“Community Organizer” Barack Hussein Obama teaches the Alinsky method of power acquisition.
Just two weeks before his death in 1972 Alinsky gave a revealing interview to Playboy magazine
. While this is not a widely known interview it provides great insight into Alinsky, his purposes and, most importantly, his deep alienation from concepts of decency, ethics and morality. In order to understand our current “leadership” we must understand Alinsky.
The current use of the term “change” is directly from Saul Alinsky. This is a term that can mean many things to many people.
“Pragmatically, the only hope for genuine minority progress is to seek out allies within the majority and to organize that majority itself as part of a national movement for change.” (Alinsky interview
“Change” is both the tool and the goal, but it is rarely defined in any way that is not strictly local and economic; better housing for the poor, better economic opportunity, better wages, better municipal services, etc. However, at the national level “change” is left undefined. In fact it seems, the process of change itself, not the implementation of “change,” is the goal.
This is amoral political agitation that appears to be about something positive but is really about deconstruction. Once the institutions of “oppression” that require “change” are destroyed, there is no plan delineated by Alinsky (nor his current crop of followers) as to what will replace them. The goal apparently is “people power” (whatever that means). However, since the concept of destroying the institutions of society specifically to “empower” people is foundational, this is the same message of Marx.
Alinsky is a Marxist without the red flag. Any institution that allows one group of people to advance at the expense of another is to be brought down even if those who advance within it do so as a result of honest hard work and talent. The essence of Alinsky is a radical idea of universal equivalence, though this has been seen before both in Marxist theory, and in Communist states. In order to agitate for “change,” Alinsky and his adherents require the population to be on edge; “rubbed raw.” This desire for endless agitation as a goal is bizarre and disturbing.
“The despair is there; now it’s up to us to go in and rub raw the sores of discontent, galvanize them for radical social change. We’ll give them a way to participate in the democratic process, a way to exercise their rights as citizens and strike back at the establishment that oppresses them, instead of giving in to apathy. We’ll start with specific issues — taxes, jobs, consumer problems, pollution – and from there move on to the larger issues: pollution in the Pentagon and the Congress and the board rooms of the megacorporations. Once you organize people, they’ll keep advancing from issue to issue toward the ultimate objective: people power.” (Alinsky interview
And here is the article and video on political correctness…
And there’s more to follow…